Sample Project
Utah Power · Salt Lake City, Utah, United States · Data Centers
Data Center Sample
PM: Michael Cain · Disciplines: 12 · Data Date: 2026-08-22
At Risk
Schedule Quality
Can this P6 schedule be trusted as a technically reliable CPM schedule?
100
Excellent
Can I trust this schedule?
Technically reliable — the network, logic and status checks support forecast dates.
Top Executive Actions
- 1.
All scored metrics pass. The schedule scores 100 (Excellent) with 2 review-level items.
Overall Score
100
Critical Issues
0
Warning Issues
0
Accepted Exceptions
0
Category Scores
Select a category to focus the quality checks below.
Quality Checks
The individual checks that make up the Schedule Quality Score.
Showing:All Categories
No problem metrics — all scored checks pass.
Highest-Value Fixes
What should the scheduler fix first?
1.Review 2 Startup / Commissioning / Turnover high float activities Review+0.2
Where are the problems concentrated?
Top 5 most concerning areas. Click a row to open its issues.
| WBS | Quality Index | Critical | Warning | Main Driver | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Startup / Commissioning / Turnover | 97 | 0 | 0 | High Float | — |
| Construction | 100 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Procurement | 100 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| Engineering | 100 | 0 | 0 | — | — |
Advanced Diagnostics
Additional CPM health indicators that do not affect the Schedule Quality Score.